After however many years it has been, I think I’ve about had it with WFSB as my homepage in my web browser. I’m trying NBC Connecticut for now, but I’d like to find a new good-looking news site for local Connecticut and other news. I’ve just about had it with WFSB.com with all the sloppy journalism I’ve seen on that site.
It really is a shame too. WFSB as a TV channel is a well-respected news team in this state. I first started watching right after moving here for the first time as a little kid back during the Gayle King/Janet Peckinpaugh/Hilton Kaderli days. Even the theme music from the WFSB newscasts has been offered by Gari Communications (a company that does news music packages and other media services) in their catalog that’s how iconic the tune has become over the past few decades. WFSB.com as a website though is fast becoming one of the sloppiest news sites I’ve ever seen.
Among some of the issues I’ve seen with their stories are:
- Loaded Headlines: Headlines that don’t line up with the story and seem to only be there to get you to click to read the story and of course boost the site’s traffic. The thing is, some people don’t click and may get the wrong idea of a story from that publicity tactic. The latest was the Facebook Bomb Scare in Manchester. The facts reported in both ‘FSB’s story and the Manchester Patch article I posted pointed to the situation being more of a bomb scare but the ‘FSB headline at the time specifically said, “Bomb Threat” which is a significant difference. It might even be enough to invite a lawsuit similar to not saying “allegedly” when talking about people that get arrested for stuff. In some cases I’ve seen WFSB.com change the headlines after the fact, but whenever things are posted on the Internet, there’s always that first rush of people then the traffic drops off afterwards, so headlines should cater to that crowd instead of whoever stops by after the initial rush of traffic. There’ve been times when I’ve shared their stories on Facebook with the loaded headline then they change it afterwards, but my Facebook link didn’t change. ;-)
- Lack Of Proofreading: You’d think professional journalists would at least run a spell check or two when posting new articles, but surprisingly I’ve seen a few stories lately that would give an English teacher something to do. The most recent blunder was a story that was out of “Norw, Connecticut.” Hmmmm….. Norw? Never heard of Norw. Do you think maybe they meant NORWICH? :-D
- Incomplete Information In Stories: The latest story and last straw will be linked after this bulletpoint, but I’m talking about stories where details that should’ve been included with the story are noticeably omitted, which readers will notice either when they get these details elsewhere or notice that a story overall is rather vague. Let’s segue out of this bulleted list with the latest example of this mess…
WFSB – Gas Prices Continue To Rise
As of this typing, the story says that “some officials” say that rising gas prices could go way up, “experts” say we could be well over $4/gallon by late April, and one “expert” thinks we’ll be around $5.50/gallon by Memorial Day. Just one question though…
WHO?!!!!!
WHO are these officials? WHO are these “experts”? WHO is this “expert” with the doom and gloom prognostication?! Believe me. I want to know who these “experts” are, because expert could mean just about anything these days. Some companies conducting astroturf campaigns (fake corporate bought-and-paid-for “grassroots campaigns”) sometimes hire “experts” to “conduct research” for them that just happens at the end of the day to line up with what the company wanted anyways. Seriously. Who are these people? I want to look them up on Google. I want to see what credentials they have, what background they have, and what they do for a living.
You know, one of the biggest mantras in academia is “cite your sources.” Not only is this a way to avoid plagiarism, but when one’s sources can be checked, you can see just how credible the sources are and see whether something’s baloney or not even if someone writes a formal academic paper on it, but that’s just a silly formality isn’t it? After all, the average news article is written with a 6th grade reading level in mind. What are those folks reading the news going to want to do in terms of research to check a story’s sources? :-P
I’ve encountered activist groups pushing for more transparency in journalism and to make journalism line up more with academia in terms of how news is reported, and I’m starting to see their point. It’s especially ironic if the journalists writing these vague stories like this went to college for a journalism degree since if their school wasn’t some “Mickey Mouse BlahBlah School” they should be familiar with the importance of citing sources, or at least naming names so the readers have a way to check some credibility here. :-P
I’ll start with NBC Connecticut for now, but if something else comes up that’s better, I’ll make the switch.